\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering \renewcommand*{\arraystretch}{1.1}\caption{Comparison of Louisiana judicial candidates in our sample (those who ran television ads) and those candidates that did not.}\label{louisianacomparison}\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrl}
\hline
\hline
Candidate Type & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Did Not Run TV Ads} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Ran TV Ads} &   \\ 
 Variable & \multicolumn{1}{c}{N} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Mean} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{SD} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{N} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Mean} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{SD} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Test} \\ 
\hline
Party & 49 & 0.67 & 0.72 & 30 & 0.5 & 0.51 & F$=1.336^{}$ \\ 
Gender & 49 & 0.49 & 0.51 & 30 & 0.67 & 0.48 & F$=2.37^{}$ \\ 
Black & 48 & 0.35 & 0.48 & 30 & 0.27 & 0.45 & F$=0.638^{}$ \\ 
Vote.Share & 49 & 40 & 18 & 30 & 41 & 14 & F$=0.051^{}$ \\ 
Winner & 49 & 0.45 & 0.5 & 30 & 0.57 & 0.5 & F$=1.018^{}$ \\ 
Court.Type & 49 &  &  & 30 &  &  & X2$=11.931^{**}$ \\ 
... City Court & 5 & 10\% &  & 5 & 17\% &  &  \\ 
... Civil District Court & 12 & 24\% &  & 7 & 23\% &  &  \\ 
... Court of Appeal & 7 & 14\% &  & 10 & 33\% &  &  \\ 
... District Judge & 23 & 47\% &  & 6 & 20\% &  &  \\ 
... Juvenile Court & 0 & 0\% &  & 2 & 7\% &  &  \\ 
... Parish Court & 2 & 4\% &  & 0 & 0\% &  &  \\ 
Prosecutor.Experience & 49 & 0.37 & 0.49 & 30 & 0.37 & 0.49 & F$=0^{}$ \\ 
Judge.Experience & 49 & 0.2 & 0.41 & 30 & 0.23 & 0.43 & F$=0.092^{}$ \\ 
Incumbent & 49 & 0.041 & 0.2 & 30 & 0.067 & 0.25 & F$=0.253^{}$\\ 
\hline
\hline
\multicolumn{8}{l}{Statistical significance markers: * p<0.1; ** p<0.05; *** p<0.01}\\ 
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}

